“Real job” versus “macaca”: a Washington Post coverage comparison

Last week, John Faust, a Democrat candidate for a Virginia House seat, put his foot in his mouth with this quip about his G.O.P. opponent, Barbara Comstock:

“In her mind, that means giving tax benefits to special interests and the super wealthy,” Foust said. “I don’t think she’s even had a real job.”

 Republicans quickly pounced on the chance to portray Foust as insensitive to women — a critical voting bloc in Virginia that Democrats have successfully courted in recent elections by accusing the GOP of being unfriendly on issues that are important to them, including birth control and abortion.

“This desperate attack shows how out of touch he is with who it is that lives and works in the 10th District and the challenges that working women, working moms and moms at home face every day by men who demean their many and demanding roles,” Comstock’s campaign manager, Susan Falconer, said in a news release. 

This story was published on August 22.  A search of “John Faust” shows nothing about this statement since then.  Just out of curiosity, I searched the Washington Post archives for coverage back in 2006 when George Allen let out his infamous “macaca” statement to an individual from the opposition filming his campaign appearance.  Here’s what I found:

While Allen was running for a Senate seat and Faust is running for a House seat, both candidates had a local angle for the Post to justify extra coverage.  Yet there seems to be no effort to turn Faust’s gaffe into any meta narrative.

By comparison, if one of the 2012 GOP candidates had said this, it would have spawned a hundred think pieces about the patriarchy and its insensitiveness toward women.  I know because the media did just that in 2012 by its own creation.

What’s the point of this?  It’s just to demonstrate how a media outlet can technically fulfill it’s obligation to report on a story, but when it suits its desires, it will create a narrative out of it for weeks, or it will bury the story by neglect.

I’m not going to pretend I’m the first to point this out, but the similarities between these stories and the disparate treatment by the same media outlet of these stories is instructive when measuring how much faith one puts in media objectivity.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s